WNIJ Commentary 22 February 2002
Diana Swanson
February is Black History Month and March is Women’s History Month.
Other months have been declared Latino History Month, Asian Awareness
Month, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Awareness Month.
Some people probably roll their eyes and wonder why we need such
special observances and why we don’t have White History Month or
Men’s History Month. For others, these yearly celebrations
have become routine. They accept the History Months but don’t
pause to consider why we still need these events. In part,
this routine acceptance is a reflection of the limited success the
History Months have had so far. Now many people realize that
there is such a thing as African American history and women’s history.
But we continue to need these reminders every year because the basic
world view of our curricula in schools and colleges and of our society
as a whole remains centered on and rooted in white male experiences
and perspectives. The standard, the norm, is still defined
the same way it was 30 or 40 years ago. For example, do we
have the same need to identify a person’s gender or race if they
are male or white as we do if they are female or black? We
say doctor or woman doctor, writer or black writer, rather than
man doctor or white writer. Maleness and whiteness is the
standard, other characteristics are deviations. Including
women’s history or Black history is often a matter of adding a famous
person here, a paragraph on a social justice movement there, while
the overall story, the standard historical narrative, remains the
same. When our mental computers cease to have their defaults
set on white and male, when the history that is taught throughout
the year is the history of all of us, then we may not need Black
History Month, Women’s History Month, and the other reminder months.
Meanwhile, I encourage us all to get on out to a History Month event
and start changing our mental default settings, that is, our assumptions
about who and what is real and significant. |